Skip to main content

Ardipithecus ramidus

For the past fifty years, anthropologists have had a traditional view that our ancestors arose or started to walk bipedality in the grassy savannas of Africa. This viewpoint got put to the test when a fossil was founded that showed a creature walking upright in an intermediate way living in the woodlands. This fossil that was discovered is named Ardipithecus ramidus (A. ramidus) or Ardi for short. Ardi dates back to 4.4 million years ago and is thought to be one of the earliest hominins known to mankind. Ardipithecus ramidus had to brain size of a chimpanzee, was not using tools (as seen by the record), and had a divergent big toe.

This week in our Human Evolution class, we read an article on Ardipithecus ramidus and then were asked to read another article on our own reading this hominin species. I will be discussing the article that I read this week regarding Ardipithecus ramidus called “Taphonomic, Avian, and Small Vertebrate Indicators of Ardipithecus ramidus Habitat”. This article was written in October of 2009 and in short, this article focused on reconstructing the habitat or environment of the hominin species Ardipithecus ramidus. This was done by gathering “an assemblage of >150,000 plants and animal fossils” (Antoine Louchart et. al, 2009). The assemblages range from birds to elephants to small mammals all suggesting along with isotopic evidence that Ardipithecus ramidus lived in a woodland area (Antoine Louchart et. al, 2009).

Very little is still known about this hominin species, but in another article I read regarding Ardipithecus ramidus written in 2009 as well, supported the evidence that this species once lived in a wooded biotope. This article is called “Macrovertebrate Paleontology and the Pliocene Habitat of Ardipithecus ramidus: Ardipithecus ramidus” and it was written in January of 2009. Even though this article was written before the previous one mention they both concluded based on fossil and isotopic evidence that a woodland area was lived in by the hominin species, therefore, testing the bipedal savanna hypothesis.

Something important to keep in mind is that reconstructing an ancient environment based on a vertebrate fossil can be imprecise, which is why the initial interpretation of Ardipithecus ramidus living in a wooded area was criticized (White et. al, 2009). Despite the possible impreciseness of vertebrate fossils, isotopic evidence regarding diet (from teeth) supported the hypothesis that they were in fact located in a forest-to woodland based area (White et. al, 2009). The following quote from the article written by White et al. helps show what they concluded for the Ardipithecus ramidus habitat, “... we, therefore, conclude that at Aramis, Ar. ramidus resided and usually died in a wooded biotype that included closed through grassy woodland and patches of true forest…” (White et al., 2009, pg. 92). Unfortunately, while trying to research new updated articles regarding habitat for this hominin species I did not find any from the past couple years, showing the little amount of evidence we possess regarding this species of hominin. There are still so many questions regarding Ardipithecus ramidus that still needs to be answered and hopefully, we will be able to in the upcoming years.

 

Link to articles:

1)    https://science.sciencemag.org/content/326/5949/66

2)    https://login.proxy006.nclive.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edscal&AN=edscal.22009706&site=eds-live&scope=site

 

Citations:

 

Taphonomic, Avian, and Small-Vertebrate Indicators of Ardipithecus ramidus Habitat. (2009). Science326(5949), 66–664.

 

WHITE, T. D., AMBROSE, S. H., GARCIA, N., GIAOURTSAKIS, L. X., HAILE-SELASSIE, Y., CLARK HOWELL, F., LEHMANN, T., LIKIUS, A., PEHLEVAN, C., AEGUSA, H., SEMPREBON, G., TEAFORD, M., GEN SUWA, VRBA, E., SU, D. F., DEGUSTA, D., BERNOR, R. L., BOISSERIE, J.-R., BRUNET, M., … FROST, S. (2009). Macrovertebrate Paleontology and the Pliocene Habitat of Ardipithecus ramidus : Ardipithecus ramidus. Science (Washington, D.C.)326(5949), 87–93.

 

Comments

  1. good stuff here. These papers are very technical but understanding the macro environment is critical to getting a handle on how the enviornment affected human origins. seems that they lived in a somewhat closed forest habitat, which is different than what was expected. super cool!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What If Two Hominin Species Met Each Other? (A Fictional Story)

I just have gotten back from school not even fully in the door yet when I realized I had forgotten my cell phone in the lab. So of course, I run back to my car and speed to my lab building to find my phone…it is so weird that I forgot it because normally I can never go anywhere without this thing, it must’ve been the thought of hunger keeping me distracted from grabbing my cell phone. While trying to get back into the lab room because it was locked (just my luck) I noticed something odd going on down the hallway. There was this bulletin board taking about Neanderthals (my teacher's favorite subject) and I swear I am not crazy, but it sounded like some type of noise was coming out of it. It sounded like a dying animal and me trying to rationalize it because I cannot be going crazy around this early in the semester, I chalked it up to hidden speakers. Boy was I wrong! While checking out the bulletin board I started to get cold and it just kept on getting colder and colder and then ne...

Bipedalism

Human Evolution. (n.d.). Retrieved June 04, 2020, from https://humanevolutionb36.weebly.com/ This week in our Human Evolution class we focused a lot on Bipedalism. Bipedalism is a form of locomotion that involves walking on two legs/limbs. Skeletal evidence for bipedalism can be vast, but when trying to apply this evidence to our past ancestor (in order to determine human evolution) it can be hard because we have very few bones that will be found.   The main evidence of bipedalism in which I will focus on is the postcranial evidence of spinal curvatures. I chose this specific evidence because I watched a video lecture called “Early Hominin Body Form” by Carol Ward. Ward was talking about spinal curvatures of early hominins vs great apes. In this video, she states that spinal curvatures are distinctive for humans and they not seen in animals such as the chimp. This means that bipedalism could have something to do with our spinal curvatures. Later on, in the lecture, Carol Ward goes ...